Instrumented Bicycle For Crash Reconstruction
InSciTech, Mountain View, CA, USA
ID: JII6
Relevant Skills: instrumentation, measurement, software, dynamics
Need
Bicycling, while a common activity, is not particularly well understood. “Simple” actions such as balancing and steady turning have been the subject of recent research efforts (e.g., Moore et al., 2011; Kooijman et al., 2011; Peterson and Hubbard, 2009; Meijaard et al., 2007) In terms of accident reconstruction it would be useful to have better estimates of meaningful motion envelop of riding behavior as well as the ability to measure aspects of an individual rider and/or bicycle. An instrumented bicycle would enable us to conduct accurate and repeatable studies such as:
- Acceleration/braking performance
- Comfortable and maximum speeds of an individual rider
- Effects of road perturbations on steer inputs and other bicycle dynamics
- Compare/test accuracy of popular fitness devices (e.g., Garmin bike computers or popular fitness apps such as Strava, Run Keeper, or Endomondo)
To address this need, we propose a modular sensor and data acquisition system that will facilitate data collection.
Desired Outcomes
We wish to be able to measure and log the following parameters:
- Steer angle
- Lean angle
- Pitch angle
- Speed (via wheel speed sensor)
- Speed and position (via GPS)
- Front and rear brake status (on/off), should also activate a high-intensity LED clearly visible to a video camera located ~30 feet to the side of the bike in daylight conditions (1 LED, or if necessary, 1 set of LEDs, for each brake)
- Estimate the forces experienced by a rider due to road perturbations
- Crank pedal cadence
Additional Measurement Requirements:
- Ideally the measurement and data logging system would be (relatively) easy to swap to different bicycles.
- An ideal measurement system would not influence the system it is trying to measure! In practice, this is never truly possible, but a useful system would not be particularly bulky, heavy, or otherwise encumber a rider.
- All the measurements should be collected by a single “computer” (microcontroller, embedded machine, DAQ box, etc.) and have a common time base
- Think about the position/alignment of the sensors. Ideally they would be placed so that swapping the system to a new bicycle would make comparison of results more straight forward without lots of calibration.
Software Requirements:
- If it is not practical to directly measure, the angular speeds for steer, lean, and pitch should be calculated in software.
- The system would make it easy to visually display the collected data.
- Whenever possible, we would prefer to use free and open source tools, e.g., Python, Octave, etc.
References
- Moore, J., Kooijman, J., Schwab, A., and Hubbard, M. (2011). Rider motion identification during normal bicycling by means of principal component analysis. Multibody System Dynamics, 25:225–244.
- J. D. G. Kooijman, J. P. Meijaard, Jim M. Papadopoulos, Andy Ruina, and A. L. Schwab. (2011). "A bicycle can be self-stable without gyroscopic or caster effects", Science 332(6027):339-342.
- Peterson, D. L. and Hubbard, M. (2009). General steady turning of a benchmark bicycle model. In Proceedings of IDETC/MSNDC 2009 the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & 7th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, number DETC2009/MSNDC-86145.
- J.P. Meijaard, J.M. Papadopoulos, A. Ruina, and A.L. Schwab. (2007). Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review - including appendix. Proc. Roy. Soc. A., 463(2084):1955-1982.